This morning we had the
expression of Brexit reason by Philip Hammond the Chancellor of Exchequer on
Sky News at 9 who was given free rein to have his say, as was Caroline Lucas
later, together with a representative of British Commerce, while John Trickett
for the Labour party had to battle to be allowed to get across the official view of the Labour Party but which he
succeeded in doing brilliantly, and then on Marr on Sunday, we first had a
dangerous and nasty rant from Ian Duncan Smith followed by an equally nasty but
more sophisticated and dangerous restatement of May’s and the hard Brexit
position by Brexit Secretary, Steve Barclay, which the brilliant and rational
Shadow Brexit Secretary, Keir Starmer, forewarned, despite the attempt by
Andrew Marr to stop him. Marr also gave a platform to the dreadful and biased
Emily Maitlis. This happened in the context that 1 million people peacefully demonstrated
in London for a People’s vote and where the revoke article 50 petition should reach
5 million votes by lunchtime.
It is now clear what will
happen during the rest of the week. The Prime Minister will be forced to issue
a three line Whip on her Party in the Commons to vote against the attempt by
all other political parties, and some Conservatives because of the threat of a
Barclay Leadsom group walk out if she does not. However, such a move will be
defeated in this instance despite the threat to sack any Government Ministers
who abstain. It is possible the move will be defeated in which instance Labour
will move a vote of non-confidence in the Government as it is evident the
Government will regard any indicative vote solution consensus as non- binding if
it goes against May’s and the Brexiteers hard red lines.
It is also evident that should
the House of Commons take control away from the Executive in terms of
controlling the indicative process, Mrs May will be forced to ignore any
agreement which breaks her red lines and those of the hard Brexiteers. The
question is does Mrs May now have the courage to take them on, given the support
she would have from the rest of the House of Commons?
No comments:
Post a Comment