Thursday, 12 April 2018

Watching a film about virtual reality in a virtual reality theatre


Yesterday 11th April became a WoW day when in the evening I entered the world of virtual reality sensory experience for the latest Spielberg blockbuster about the world of virtual reality sensory experience. Ready Player One, to take a break from my reality world in which first thing that morning I had agreed to elective eye surgery to save my deteriorating sight.

As someone who for seven decades since the conclusion of WW2  has resisted the fair ground thrill ride I decided  to experience that the  latest Cineworld 4Dbox total cinema sensory theatre, ignoring the safety warnings that the presentation is not suitable for children, pregnant women, those with severe disability and elders such as  me and in this instance those whose  sight is affected by 3D and where according to staff at the Cineworld Newcastle I am the oldest individual to dare,

I was inspired to choose the recent addition to Cineworld Newcastle instead of a standard seat in mixed seat auditorium after earlier in the week watching the BBC mini series recreating the assessment and training of the WW2 Special Operations Executives who were trained to be parachuted behind enemy lines and create havoc after one applicant overcame her lifelong fear of heights by a vertical climb of sixty feet and then crossing between trees by walking on a rope while holding another above. The series is a form of virtual reality because there are safety features to prevent accidents and psychology profiling to avoid the unsuitable. Then in WW2 people were selected and trained to be killed and to accept the likelihood they would be killed or would need to take their own lives to prevent torture and revealing the identities and locations of others.

Did I fear a theatre fairground thrill ride synchronised with a screened film more than I fear elective eye surgery?

The Cineworld 4Dbox experience has existed for several years but it was possible to also experience only the Ghost Train effects in a mixed auditorium of standard and  sensory seats and which I tried when wanting to watch the latest Mad Max at the O2 Millennium arena in London, and where following the creation of the latest total theatre experience at the Middlesbrough Cineworld, the older sears have been transferred to the Bolden multiplex where for example someone with disability can sit in their wheel chair  while their able bodied partner enjoys the full effects experience in an adjacent seat.

Last year Sky TV introduced us to Westworld in which standard human beings can physically enter a virtual reality world where artificially created human being lookalikes provide the experience entertainment until one of them realises she is being memory wiped and bodily reassembled as guests shoot, kill and rape. In Ready Player One participants create an Avatar of their choosing but remain outside wired up and with sensory pads, and one assumes individual comprehensive sensory unit pods as well as desk top screen, lap tops, ipads and iphones variations of today and where the experience of being inside is an antidot to the reality lives of uncontrolled global capitalism while maniac leaders  like Trump and Putin use social media to commence to make real devastating human extermination war

The game being played in the Speilberg film combines the search for clues leading to keys which will unlock the prize of a golden egg (replacing the Golden ticket of Charlie’s Chocolate Factory), which will enable the winner to gain control of the half a billion wealth of the game owner who has died and left a virtual reality Will. The Game is also fought in the real world as the Chief Executive of the second biggest game franchise wants total domination and hires a real world assassin using drones to track and destroy anyone who appears close to winning the game in addition to an army of players to try and gain the prize, together with a team of creative game creators to work out the clues for their army of paid players. The film also has a contemporary take on debt collectors a bounty hunter who can restrain their victims on in punishment pods managed by the rogue led game corporation.

A feature of the legacy created by the creator of the Oasis world game is his virtual reality museum in which his whole life everything he has experienced, read and said cab be recreated and studied but unlike my prediction made in 2003 when I commenced the Artman 101 project, the ability of anyone, anywhere, anytime to see, hear and record what anyone, everywhere, all time experiences, with the required technology is  fixed,  whereas in my world there is the ability to alter the record of  all past experience to reflect the views and wishes of the individual at the controls. This means that only hard physical files of information will remain of value as all digital records can be changed or erased.

What I did not foresee is the harvesting of data by governments, global enterprises including those operated by crime orientated. The BBC published a list of the 12 instances where government records suddenly were lost from laps tops and then Edwin Snowden walked out with millions of records hidden in a memory stick in a game cube to beat the security controls.

What I had not appreciated until recently is how our understanding of how the brain works coupled with the creation of artificial intelligence and the ability to create digital communication programmes can affect the outcomes of elections, develop targeted sales programmes and harvest intelligence profiles of people in their worldwide millions. It is evident that digital communications technology can also be used to alter and control individual minds as well as to do so collectively. The era of the contemporary Manchurian Candidate has arrived.

Yesterday evening venturing into the total sensory theatre of the Cineworld 4DBOX I also wanted to understand something of what generations will experience in the developments already planned in process of delaying applications until sufficient commercial sales make sufficient profits to add to the wealth holders and cover development costs.

The present 4D theatrical experiences is only a foretaste of what will come. At Newcastle Cineworld there are eight rows of 20 seats in group of four all interlinked with two units of seats at the back and four units of four at the front allowing for two-wheel chairs uses o enjoy the Ghost train effects which comprised controlled angled sprays of water to represent real water, rain or blood or other substances such as sick. The temperature can also be controlled with icy or warm blasts of air and auditorium can be filled from the smoke of an explosion. I had anticipated the sensations of galling climbing or jerk movements from being hit by a truck or fail to stop before a wall. Unexpected is the back of seats so you can feel hit by a punch or being stabbed in the back. I am no sure how often I will repeat the experience, but it is the only way to experience I film about entering virtual reality world.  The young male assistant  with whom I spoke at the end of the film in the auditorium said he had watched the film twice. The last performance was last night as to day it is Rampage.

Yesterday evening 11th April 2018  my son in law celebrated his birthday with one of my daughters enjoying a seafood meal  while at the same time on BBC1 a bank manager from the seaside town where they live was cooking seafood for fisherman on the waterfront in Peru under the direction of one the country’s leading creators of national dishes, reminding of a meal eaten at a seafood restaurant which had commenced with a dressed crab starter and a bottle of Sancerre followed delicious fish dishes  no longer remembered from some three decades ago at  the French seaside town of Le Touquet.

Earlier in the day I agreed to elective I surgery later his summer to have my eyesight visiting rhe specialist eye hospital in Sunderland in the afternoon to have a back photo taken to check the back of the eye to assess if there was also any damaged caused by my diabetes,

Tuesday, 27 March 2018

Protection from Cyber warfare


The need for the British State to protect itself from   cyber warfare by other states and international enterprises

Information to place present developments in context.

1.    In 1984  I was  the  only local authority chief officer  (and with 10 years’ experience), one of a handful of public service senior personnel among directors of national and international producing, financial and other service corporations being considered  at the Henley Management College Senior Management course as suitable for General Management and where  afterwards I prepared a  paper on the implications of the course for Local Government which after sending to Michael Heseltine, the MP for  Henley, he wrote to say the document was being circulated in Whitehall, and where I had  correspondence from the head of human resources at the Ministry of Defence.



1.1  Three issues from that course are relevant to Inquiries presently being undertaken by Committees and individual members of the House of Commons. The first was the value of moving Headquarters to countries with stable governments who offered low corporate taxation together with the ability to trade with the least state interference. A general contempt for politicians was expressed although there appeared to be division between those who held this opinion because politicians could be bought and those because they could not.



1.2  Secondly there was advice from the European Director of an International USA based corporation on the direct employment or use of “creatives” who could achieve new high-level profit-making business units but whose activities were likely to include crossing lines in terms of state lawfulness and corporate ethical standards. It was essential to take precautions in advance to eliminate record of their involvement by the company and individual accountability for their employment or use if they crossed the line and were caught. The bigger companies, particularly world-wide companies were able to plan for this in advance and have a unit(s) with responsibility for the task of eliminate corporate involvement and individual accountability.



1.3  Thirdly the construction of the such courses was based on the psychometric testing of all senior managers, using information on their known backgrounds, both personal and occupational and which have been explained and developed by Meredith Belbin in his series of research studies and advisories.

2 Psychometric testing and analysis with its predictive potential has developed over recent decades because of our increased knowledge of how the human brain works and impacts on perception and behaviour and the work on artificial intelligence which I suggest if adapted to test tube created life forms threatens to make human beings redundant and expendable. In 1962 my psychology tutor was the head of the Department of Behavioural Science at Oxford University the creative John Beichon who took his team to the USA, became Chief Executive of Which, headed a London Polytechnic and helped the development of the Open University.

2.1 In the four hour marathon of the Digital Culture Media and sports House of Commons Select Committee on March 27th witness Christopher Wylie mentioned how the development of psychometric testing and analysis  was the basis  or a major component in the predictive work underpinning the selection of those  to  be individually targeted to achieve their involvement/participation or to turn out for a specific activity such as  voting, and he mentioned the value of the Cambridge location because of the proximity with the Cambridge Psychology Institute, its work and its professors in providing the framework to which harvested data and the digital technology would be applied.

3. Because of issues related to Brexit and more general Party politics it is possible individual politicians may not have the research sources or advisors to place the present situation the context of recent events and therefore I believe the following information may be of value and I begin with the extraordinary loss of  mass data collation in the UK which was open to data harvesting by other states and international corporations. I attach as an appendix of the BBC news report which listed the succession of data losses and included concerns in relation to security, criminals and Terrorism. This pales into insignificance given the nature and volume of confidential information taken by Edward Snowden from the USA before his flight to Russia.

4 It is also evident that the David Cameron Nick Clegg coalition government had an awareness of the implications of developments in cyber warfare when in September 2013 the Defence Secretary Philip Hammond issued press statements and announcements that as part of the MOD’s full spectrum of Defence capability the recruitment of hundreds of cyber experts and cyber reservists to help defend the UK’s national Security. Mrs May was Home Secretary at this time.

It is worrying that when the Prime Minister was asked about the cyber threat to our democratic institutions and processes during this afternoon’s Liaison Committee meeting she said she had not been made aware of any evidence to this effect

UK
-----------------
-----------------
Related BBC sites
·         Sport
·         Weather
·         Democracy Live
·         Radio 1 Newsbeat
·         CBBC Newsround
·         On This Day
·         Editors' Blog
Languages
·                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Newyddion
http://stats.bbc.co.uk/o.gif?~RS~s~RS~News~RS~t~RS~HighWeb_Story~RS~i~RS~7449927~RS~p~RS~38251~RS~a~RS~Domestic~RS~u~RS~/1/hi/uk/7449927.stm~RS~r~RS~https://www.google.co.uk/~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~29~RS~
BBC Page last updated at 09:36 GMT, Monday, 25 May 2009 10:36 UK

Previous cases of missing data
Files
Blunders involving sensitive official information have hit the headlines
There has been a series of cases where confidential information has been lost or stolen.
Several laptops containing sensitive data have gone missing and files marked Top Secret have been left on a commuter train.
In one of the most high-profile cases, a private consulting firm lost a computer memory stick containing the details of tens of thousands of prisoners.
Here are other cases to emerge in the recent past:
MAY 2009: RAF PERSONNEL DATA
It emerged that data lost from RAF Innsworth in Gloucestershire the previous September included 500 highly sensitive files, containing details of individuals' extra-marital affairs, debts and drug use.
An internal MoD memo passed to the BBC warned that the material "provides excellent material for Foreign Intelligence Services and blackmailers".
On the same day, a report from the Information Commissioner told the NHS to improve its data security, after the watchdog took action against 14 NHS organisations in the last six months.
JANUARY 2009: PRISONER MEDICAL RECORDS
A health worker in Lancashire lost a memory stick containing the medical details of more than 6,000 prisoners and ex-prisoners from HMP Preston.
The data was encrypted, but the password had been written on a note which was attached to the stick when it was misplaced.
NOVEMBER 2008: GOVERNMENT COMPUTER PASSWORDS
A memory stick - holding passwords for a government computer system - was found in the car park of a pub in Staffordshire.
The Gateway website gives access to services including tax returns and child benefits. The memory stick was lost by an employee of a subcontractor called Atos Origin.
OCTOBER 2008: MINISTRY OF DEFENCE DATA
A computer hard drive containing the personal details of about 100,000 of the Armed Forces was reported missing during an audit carried out by IT contractor EDS.
It is thought to contain more than 1.5m pieces of information, possibly unencrypted, including the details of 600,000 potential recruits, a small amount of information about bank details, passport numbers, addresses, dates of birth, driving licence details and telephone numbers.
The Ministry of Defence police said it was investigating the disappearance but it is not yet known whether or not it was stolen.
SEPTEMBER 2008: JUSTICE AND RAF EMPLOYEE DETAILS
The government confirmed that a portable hard drive holding details of up to 5,000 employees of the justice system was lost in July 2007.
The details of employees of the National Offender Management Service in England and Wales, including prison staff, were lost by a private firm, EDS.
Officials only realised the data was missing in July of this year. Justice Secretary Jack Straw launched an inquiry.
Also this month, the MoD admitted that tens of thousands of personnel files had been lost from RAF Innsworth in Gloucestershire.
Hard disks containing the data, which included names, addresses and some bank account details, were taken from a secure area.
AUGUST 2008: DATA ON CRIMINALS
Home Office contractor PA Consulting admitted losing a computer memory stick containing information on all 84,000 prisoners in England and Wales.
It also held personal details of about 10,000 prolific offenders.
The Home Office suspended the transfer of all further data to the private firm pending the outcome of an investigation.
An Information Commissioner's investigation later ruled that the Home Office had broken data protection laws over the incident and must sign a formal undertaking to improve its procedures in future.
JULY 2008: MEMORY STICKS AND LAPTOPS
The Ministry of Defence confirmed that 121 computer memory sticks and more than twice as many laptops than previously thought have been lost or stolen in the past four years.
Armed Forces Minister Bob Ainsworth gave a written statement to parliament saying 121 USB memory devices had gone astray - five of which contained secret data.
And in a parliamentary written answer, Defence Secretary Des Browne said 747 laptops had been stolen - 400 more than originally reported. Of those, 32 have been recovered so far.
JUNE 2008: TERROR DOCUMENTS
A senior intelligence officer from the Cabinet Office was suspended after documents were left on the seat of commuter train from London Waterloo. A passenger later handed them to the BBC.
The seven-page file, classified as "UK Top Secret", contained a report entitled "Al-Qaeda Vulnerabilities" and an assessment of the state of Iraq's security forces.
Cabinet Minister Ed Miliband said there had been a "clear breach" of security rules, which forbid the removal of such documents from government premises.
But Mr Miliband said national security did not seem to be "at risk".
Two inquiries - one by the Cabinet Office, the other by the Metropolitan Police - have been launched.
APRIL 2008: MCDONALD'S LAPTOP
An Army captain's laptop was taken from under his chair as he ate in a McDonald's, near the Ministry of Defence's Whitehall headquarters.
The MoD said the data on the laptop was not sensitive, and was fully encrypted.
This is the latest MoD laptop theft to be made public and it came after the government tightened the rules on employees taking computers out of work.
Whitehall staff are now banned from taking unencrypted laptops or drives containing personal data outside secured office premises.
JANUARY 2008: MILITARY RECRUITS
A laptop computer belonging to a Royal Navy officer was stolen from car in Edgbaston, Birmingham.
It contained the personal details of 600,000 people who had expressed an interest in, or applied to join, the Royal Navy, Royal Marines and the RAF.
It contained data including passport numbers, National Insurance numbers and bank details.
Defence Secretary Des Browne later admitted the inquiry into the loss of the Royal Navy officer's laptop uncovered two similar thefts since 2005.
At the time, Dr Liam Fox, shadow defence secretary, said 68 MoD laptops had been stolen in 2007, 66 in 2006, 40 in 2005 and 173 in 2004.
DECEMBER 2007: DRIVING TEST CANDIDATES
The details of three million candidates for the UK driving theory test went missing in the US.
Names, addresses and phone numbers - but no financial information - were among the details stored on a computer hard drive, which belonged to a contractor working for the Driving Standards Agency.
The information was sent electronically to contractor Pearson Driving Assessments in Iowa and the hard drive was then sent to another state before being brought back to Iowa, where it went missing.
Ministers said the information had been formatted specifically to meet the security requirements of Pearson Driving Assessments and was not "readily usable or accessible" by third parties.
NOVEMBER 2007: CHILD BENEFIT RECORDS
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) lost two computer discs containing the entire child benefit records, including the personal details of 25 million people - covering 7.25 million families overall.
The two discs contained the names, addresses, dates of birth and bank account details of people who received child benefit. They also included National Insurance numbers.
They were sent via internal mail from HMRC in Washington, north-east England, to the National Audit Office in London on 18 October, by a junior official, and never arrived.
The Metropolitan Police were informed of the loss in November and extensive searches began.
In December, a reward of £20,000 was offered for the return of the two discs, but they were never recovered.
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/o.gif
SEE ALSO
More MoD laptop thefts revealed
21 Jan 08 |  Politics
'No cover-up' on lost driver data
18 Dec 07 |  Politics
Discs 'worth £1.5bn' to criminals
28 Nov 07 |  Politics
Second spy loses laptop
28 Mar 00 |  UK
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/o.gif
·         SHARED
·         READ
·         WATCHED/LISTENED
·         BBC News
·         BBC News
·         BBC News
·         BBC News
·         BBC News
·         BBC News
·         BBC News
·         BBC News






Wednesday, 14 March 2018

Tory hypocrisy


I urge everyone not to be fooled by Tory Party tactics to paint the Official Leader of the opposition, Shadow Foreign  and Home Secretaries and Shadow Chancellor as Enemies of the State and this morning March 14th 2018  we had a second example where some Labour Party Members and the Official spokesman for the Scottish Nationalists showed the kind of John Bull send in the gunboats mentality which Tony Blair achieved when he persuaded the House of Commons to support his war in Iraq  based on the dodgy dossier.

First before reading further please listen or read the text of what Jeremy Corbyn actually said this afternoon and pay attention to the questions he asked which the Prime Minister evaded and backbenchers jeered..

These are the facts. The Prime Minister supported by the Foreign Secretary has provided a Royal state visit to the Saudi reactionaries who think it is a big deal to allow women to drive. Accounts have emerged of the extent to which women who go to Mecca have been raped and sexually abused and we have the recent evidence from places as diverse as Oxford, Telford and Rotherham of Asian men, men of Pakistan origin who regard all woman as sex objects and have preyed upon vulnerable  young people who are white because there are internal rules within their religion  that if you rape a woman you are not punished if you marry her  and this is an open approach in many Muslim  controlled state. Yesterday it was good to listen to BBC radio make clear these facts when interviewing the Conservative Party member for Telford who called for an independent investigation into what  has happened there, which the Labour local authority has today agreed having attempted to kick into long grass by passing to the Inquiry for England and Wales who said no.

The visit of the Saudi dictator was designed to sell more British made weapons to be used on civilians, however unintentional, by the Saudi’s in the Yemen as they have in the past where the numbers of dead and severely injured continues to rise and disease epidemics and food and water shortages continue. So much for the attack on the lack of civil rights in Russia where women have greater rights but both tyrants imprison and kill their political opponents. Members of the Saudi Royal Household have financed and supported Terrorism and may still do.

Beware also that Mrs May has announced that she intends to introduce legislation which gives the government powers to secretly monitor and act against anyone she and her government considers to be enemies of the state beyond the issue of terrorism. This may be just a ploy against Jeremey Corbyn who has consistently   voted against the measures taken and proposed. In this he is supported by former British MI5 and M6 agent John Cornwall, better known as John Le CarrĂ© who has written that Britain’s Big Brother 1984 state is the envy of spy organisations world wide

It Is the Tory Government over the past seven years with Liberal Democrat help over the first five years that cut back on our defence services, on diplomacy and the police. I accept that she has strengthened anti terrorism forces, but her success is demonstrated by the four attacks in London, the attack in Manchester and in Salisbury. The Government has no proof the Salisbury attack was directed by the Russian president or his Government and today the French President has joined Jeremy Corbyn in requesting Britain make the available evidence to a recognised independent body for assessment.

The wodk of Mrs May cannot be trusted, I won’t call an election yes, I will call an election. We won’t accept this or that re the EEC referendum but then I will when her position is threatened within the cabinet. Her agenda is stop Labour coming to power under Jeremy Corbin and she will say and do what it takes to achieve this objective. Hugh Gaitskell the former Labour Leader in a personal letter once wrote to me that the Tories will do or say anything to get and stay in power. I disagreed with him over weapons of mass civilian extermination but he was right what he said back in the1960’s about Tory belief in their destiny to rule.

Nor should anyone be fooled by promised to do something about the Russians who have made billions fortunes exploiting Russian people. Putin himself was poor and is now one of the richest individuals on the planet with his money placed one suspects through London and other complex levels of out of Russia, beyond tax money laundering and hiding. At least it is real money stolen from his people unlike Trump where  the complexity  which is said to begin  with the German Deutscher bank is also reported to mask questions  about the real  value of his empire ( my source here is the excellent book Collusion by Luke Harding) and the BBC also did an excellent documentary on how Putin came to power was courted by Bush and Blair and decided to concentrate on being wealthy and untouchable using his security service former colleagues and lifelong associates to become Tsar  He like the current President of China have been impressed by Britain  having a heredity crowned life term head of state and have decided to follow suit.

When Mr Corbyn politely pointed out in response to the first statement by Mrs May on Monday that her Party had accepted over three quarters of a million direct from Russians in London and we don’t know if they have also funded the various Tory Party front organisations or global financial and business interests that now use the global intelligence and security organisations which use London as their base  employing former and one assumes some seconded British security personnel for off the books work

It is also worth reminding that we have been here before with Mrs Thatcher. In 1979 she bypassed MI5 who opposed her wish to vet everyone who applied for any job with government or government contract to stop socialists and trade union activists who could or otherwise be blackmailed or bought. Most people are not aware that the number vetting each year rose to over 300000 and in total between 3 to 4 million applications. She then used agencies to do the blacklisting. She also was given advice to take on Argentina over the Falklands despite the potential cost. Russia is not Argentina and the majority Russian Chinese, and the world regards bulldog England with contempt and derision.

A further but different example of the Tory plan to split the Parliamentary Party from its leadership and membership was the Shadow Chancellor attacking 20plus minute Party Political broadcast on the economy given by Chancellor Hammond yesterday. It was a great Party-political broadcast and performance by him. It was brilliantly effective and timed to end at I pm. Some idiot (the kindest description) in the BBC radio News team swallowed the bait and cut the response of the official Opposition after one minute. So, we have had three days of electioneering to cover the bad polls and the difficulties over Brexit

This evening I joined an audience in 400 other cinemas to wish Michael Caine happy 85th birth when in a live half hour after the first public showing of the brilliant film of his life centred on the rise of working class youth in the 1960’s and called My generation. He provided a devastating indictment of the return to establishment power and enslavement of most of the people to know their place. Fortunately for those who have missed the event in addition to the film being given further showings there are six programmes on the background interviews with some of the leading figures of the era to be shown on TV. . It is a brilliant film and the live after session ranks alongside that given last year by John Le CarrĂ©.

For those who think I am exaggerating watch the Tory backbenchers and some of those on the front during Prime Minister Question Time earlier today and you witness the sincerity, integrity of their form of politics. There one word to describe what has happened over the past three days. Hypocrisy.

Sunday, 4 February 2018

Speaker John Bercow and representative Parliamentary democracy


The contrast between the reception given to Jacob Rees Mogg at Bristol University last week, and that to Speaker John Bercow at Newcastle could not have been more marked. It provided an interesting barometer on the approach of university students to politics today. Mr Rees Mogg is a powerful advocate of free speech and independent thinking from a traditional white male Catholic perspective, raised in childhood by a nanny who now looks after his large family of children and where the boys can expect to attend Eton and Oxbridge like their father, shouted down by a small group of students. I was one of the hundreds turned away from Newcastle University despite arriving half an hour before John Bercow due to speak as the Insight programme of public lecture experienced is biggest audience for 20 years and have had to rely on a recording of which had the audience cheering before he started and when he finished outlining the reforms he had achieved since becoming Speaker in 2009.

Before then he spoke warmly of the role the Member of Parliament for Newcastle central was playing at Westminster and he also mentioned the member of Parliament for South Shields who had arranged for members of the Key club of South Shields to attend the gathering, an interfaith group enabling the homeless to gain footholds more stable lives. It is noteworthy that the member of South Shields was in th3 House of Commons on the Friday moving the second reading Bill pressing the government to define food poverty as the Speaker was visited or had visited a food bank in Newcastle. A second reading was no given without a vote.

One similarity between to the two men is that they both started out on the extreme right of the Tory Party with John Bercow advocating repatriation of immigrants, impressing Norman Tebbit sufficiently to make him vice chairman of a group set up to organise students to vote Conservative before the 1987 general election. After working in in Merchant banking and public relations MT Bercow established with Dr Julian Lewis a business in advanced speaking and campaigning which has trained 600 Conservatives many of whom became Members of Parliament. However, like St Paul, John’s conversion is regarded as left of centre by sections of the Tory party and led to a failed shabby attempt to prevent his reselection before the 2015 General Election, Rees Mogg has shown no such political shifting, being noted a strong Thatcherite and a fervent Brexiteer with one Sunday Newspaper forecasting moves to make him one of three saviours of the hard Leave campaign together with friends again Boris Johnson and Michael Gove an replace Teresa May and Philip Hammond in Downing Street..

Despite the arrival of more women and those of non-white ethnicity in the House of Commons there remains a powerful group of political and social Neanderthals within the Tory Party which John Bercow explained existed when he supported the wish for a nursery in the Houses of Parliament to replace one of the many drinking bars. The nursery opened and the pistol shooting gallery closed. Perhaps the most important and timely reform he has successfully achieved is the significant change in the balance of power between the backbench Members of the House of Commons and the government of the day which irrespective of political Party, if holding an election mandate in numbers, has always tried to prevent challenge to its legislative programme and avoid the detailed scrutiny of its decisions together with the legislative outcomes.

To achieve this objective Mr Bercow has gained sufficient support from across political parties to ensure that as many Members of the House, as possible, can question Ministers on their allotted half or hour on a cycle of Departments, Monday to Wednesday when Parliament is sitting. Because of the growing length of the six question exhange between the Official Leader of the Opposition and the Prime Minister at noon on Wednesdays, the session has lengthened from the half period since the two previous 15-minute sessions a week were amalgamated, to between forty and forty-five minutes. The second important development is the speaker’s prerogative for allowing backbenchers to question ministers about urgent political matters of the day and which sometimes over the past five years has become two or three such requests granted on one day from the occasional one. The total is 400 requests granted since the innovation was agreed. Mr Bercow also politely reminds Ministers that they are there to be quizzed and not to make statements on behalf of government policy and decision taking which they are also at Liberty to do by formal statements and questioning, which the Speaker and the backbenchers prefer than the written statement released at the weekend or when Parliament is not in session, the printed newspaper article and the informal media leaks and briefings. In addition, a backbench committee has been created to agree the subjects for allotted days when they can open the subject at which the ministerial and shadow ministerial team members participate but cannot necessarily direct the outcome in terms of voting on any motions submitted.

Mr Bercow admitted less success in the promotion of new legislation by backbenchers and even when there is quantitative all party-political support, the willingness of the government legislative lawyers to assist can prove a stumbling block to a Private Member Bill making progress. A recent development has been the ability of any citizen who can command support from four others to launch an E petition which if it gains support of 10000 the Government responds with 100000 required for a debate usually in Westminster Hall but 9 so far have made it to the House of Commons.

 A different dimension has been the John’s approach to bringing Parliamentary democracy to people in addition to bringing people to see what happens within the Palace of Westminster,  John tries to accept every invitation to speak and he is supported by an outreach team, the head of which spoke at a reunion of Ruskin students two years ago which I attended the weekend  of those fateful few days when the Member of Parliament, Jo Cox, was assassinated by a right wing extremist  and Britain voted by  a narrow majority to leave the E.E,C.  Mr Bercow mentioned that among the 1 million visitors that come to Westminster there is a constant stream of school children attending the Parliamentary education centre which is adjacent to the House of Lords, which had also been a concern to some of their Lordships.

Just the day before his visit to Newcastle the House of Commons, on a free vote. And against the approach of the Leader of the House, agreed an amending motion proposed by the Labour Opposition that the House should leave the Palace of Westminster from 2025 to 2031 so there could be complete repair and refurbishment costing a presently estimated £3.5 thousand million. The Commons will move to a planned and prepared site at Richmond House in Whitehall and the Lords, if they agree to the Queen Elizabeth Hall which is across from Parliament Square. What is not clear if the Commons will become a fit for purpose chamber enabling everyone elected to sit, speak and vote and to have appropriate office accommodation with the support staffing required. This should also address all the problems of the present building which work against the need to address equality as well as general and personal safety issues. In this respect the Speaker made the point that there are some 7000-people working at Westminster of which some 750 are directly employed in addition to elected Members of the Commons and the appointed members of the Lords.

The Speaker made passing reference to the role of the Party Whips giving the impression to me they are regarded as a necessary evil in terms of his focus on representative Parliamentary democracy and this goes to the heart of the issues raised in Parliamentary Socialism, written by Ralph Miliband which influenced me in the 1960’s, the issue of referendums with the Brexit vote of the people versus the majority view in both Houses to remain and the way the political process should be conducted in the age of global capitalism and global communications systems and powers.  These are issues for separate debate and which will be part of my review of For the Many published by OR books on taking Labour’s 2017 General Election Manifesto to the next level and which has a preface from Ken Loach and an afterword by Jon Lansman.

Will the proposed changes prevent Westminster returning as a cosy club for professional politicians, supported by mainstream media, and public relations lobbying firms acting for global business and finance interests? There also needs to be greater transparency for the All-party Interests groups, and those who fund them and where there are some 500 for the 1300 Parliamentary. The televising of debates and the verbatim printings of the Official record are insufficient for the average citizen to understand the extent and nature of political and economic power in Britain.

Thursday, 4 January 2018

Betting the House Ross and McTague


Tim Ross and Tom McTague, two experience political commentators, have published an excellent but limited account of the 2017 General Election, Betting the House, limited because the main contenders have not participated openly. The book is also written based on having an appeal to all wings of all political parties and therefore criticism is muted.

The first fact avoided is that Teresa May, perhaps the most hypocritical of post war Prime Ministers, sanctioned a dirty and unscrupulous character assassination campaign against Jeremy Corbyn just after she made her speech on the steps of Downing street in 2015.  The book also underplayed the extent to which individual members of the Labour Party in House of Commons planned to oust Jeremy from the leadership despite believing that some of their number would lose their seats. It was a perfect storm which most of us outside mainstream media and the Westminster bubble were able to see, and the sad aspect is that they appear to have learned nothing and believe that with time and mastery of the latest technique in public manipulation. The party-political class in Britain remains delusional which makes our future dangerous and unpredictable

Having said this credit has to be given to the Parliamentary Labour Party because without the open rebellion and plotting with mainstream journalists and political commentators by a number of Labour Members of the House of Commons, Mrs May would not have believed the Opinion polls and the advisers who said an early election would give her the kind of majority to secure her premiership and negotiate a form of Brexit likely to appeal to the majority rather than those in the Tory party who have been able to imprison her until she had served their purpose, together with the racists and the political morons who formed a good chunk of those voting for Brexit.

There is also not much in the book that has not already been revealed by mainstream media and Parliamentarians over the six months that have followed. There was one piece of information which helped to explain the attempt to protect May’s effective Deputy Prime Minister, Damian Green, that his wife had been her  tutor at Oxford. The second came at the end when faced with open talk of pressing her to resign, she persuaded the 1922 committee membership to give her a chance by admitting to them she had got it badly wrong, was accountable and would work to make it right and would go when they asked.  However, having played the humility card then, she is wrong to believe, along with Jeremy Hunt, that eating humble pie now about the NHS and Community Care crisis before the Commons return will save them from the wrath of their own Party and that of the majority of the House of Commons. She cannot sack or move Hunt without sacking herself. If the Tory Party is to continue in power for the rest of this parliament and then not face electoral disintegration of the order which Blair achieved in 1997, then she must fundamentally change the face of her government, and then its policies, which means getting rid of her Chancellor, Boris and Hunt and making space for Grieve, Morgan and Soubry. She lacks the mettle to do a Corbyn and appoint only those who share in her vision if she has one. The truth emerged in the book at the point when the authors commented that her closest advisers acted more like well-intentioned parents than staff, Labour's strength is now more than Corbyn’s brilliance. The Genie is out of the bottle and May and her party have a choice between a long and painful political annihilation or a quick one -Betting the House Paper edition Biteback Publishing.