From cultural fiction, I turn to the main political events of the week. I
begin with the America of Donald Trump and the recent second series of train
journeys and stop overs across the USA by the former Conservative Deputy Party
Chairman, Margaret Thatcher supporter and Leadership candidate Michael Portillo,
and who travelled across the great plains to the Grand Canyon, Arizona. It is
said that Mr Portillo who like me has a part Spanish background, was the front
runner to become Tory Party Leader in 2001 before be backed out (it is said
after pressure from the still influential Lord Tebbit, whose appearance on the
Andrew Marr show in 2014 heralded the first announcement by the then Home Secretary
of a national inquiry into historical child abuse for England and Wales).
Mr Portillo has since remained a political commentator since leaving the
House of Commons in 2005 by being the only other stalwart of the late Friday
evening Politics show. His main career move was to become the expert on
railways throughout the UK, Europe and now the USA although he had featured in several
TV series, notably Great Britons.
The USA Train series is the second series with the first commencing in
Manhattan travelling to Niagara Falls and then Gettysburg before Washington DC
to Mount Vernon and Jamestown. In the recent series he commenced in Missouri,
St Louis, and moved to Jefferson City and Washington, Sedalia, St Josephs and
the meat packing capital of the state, Kansas City, from there along Tornado Alley, from Lawrence to Topeka and Dodge City and
then Lamar Colorado; he visits Pueblo and learns what it takes to become a
cowboy, the tourist centre of Colorado Springs comes before the n journey through
the Arkansas river gorge on a narrow-gauge railway, and then to New Mexico and Santé
Fe, Albuquerque and ending at the Grand Canyon. This week I am watching his
journey from Minneapolis and St Paul built around the Mississippi River and then
into the Deep South, to La Crosse Wisconsin Tomah and Portage, Milwaukee to
Racine and the windy city of Chicago before travelling the Mississippi.
The journeys of Mr Portillo, and in which he always shows respect for
the local history and cultures, are highlighting the size of the country, and the
separateness and individuality of states, counties and communities,
particularly from the Federal government and which reminds of my long belief in
a one country states of Europe with Russia having the same relationship as
Canada and Turkey as Mexico with the USA. It is several generations since I
listened to Alistair Cooke’s weekly Letters from America on the BBC Radio and
continue to treasure his book America
which accompanied a TV series which also provided an overview of the history,
vastness and diversity of this part of the American continents. Since those
days when the cinema pictures provided perspectives on a weekly basis with the
films on the USA participation in World War II, the Saturday morning children’s
show Western, the gangster movies, small town dramas and the sophisticated
relationships of the big cities, I believe I have understood the awesome individual
power of the USA President and its limitations.
Anyone who wants to understand something of the truth of how a
Presidency works in practice should view all 140 episodes of the West Wing, the
recent film of Jackie (Kennedy’s
Camelot) or the current TV series Scandal
and Homeland. It is impossible
to compare the roles of a heredity monarch, personified with Queen Elizabeth,
celebrating 65 years in office, and whose
function to advise and warn
but not command in terms of changes in
the laws and political policies and
actions, with that of the elected head
of state in the USA where the office has a maximum tenure of eight years, and is actually the
commander and chief with the power to
create an executive order, the equivalent of the Royal Prerogative.
The problem here in the UK is the misconception that the Government is
just the Cabinet led by the Prime
Minister or even the raft of Ministers, their individual political advisors and
Civil servants but in reality is a
complex balance of powers brought
together through the Privy Council and with a distinct role for the individual Peer members of the House of Lordships, the Barons, descended
from the Barons of Magna Carta (The Upper House) and where there are Privy
Council sub committees for the judiciary separate from the law makers and for
national security which covers the role
of the various security services. Much of the work of the Crown, the Privy
Council and Government is secret but recently there been greater transparency
admitting that through the head of state treaties are entered with other
counties and that are sometimes secret.
Separately I have been writing about Spies, and those working undercover
and which includes the use of informants, traditionally used to bring down
criminals and their networks but also as a major means to know what other
countries are up to and as an offensive and defensive weapon in terms changing
the balance of power between neighbours and in the twentieth century between
continents. We are unlikely to know how
far moves to bring the buffer states between Russia an existing NATO countries
into the alliance provoked Russia into
making moves against Ukraine or how far the openly knowledge that under
President Obama the USA was reducing interest in NAT0 in part because of the lack of funding coming from
Europe, more because of the to give greater
attention to the Pacific ring and the political and economic advancement of
China, in part because of the new approach to offensive intelligence military action through cyber
technology and military action and
because of the use of digitally controllable
pilotless air machines, defensive umbrella shields and so on it all means that
unless one is a top insider one only sees what is intended to be seen and the
appearance of anything is rarely its reality.
The British popular vote against the capitalist enterprise of the European
Common Market created the international climate which enthused Donald Trump and
his supporters into believing they could triumph in the USA using same methods
successful in the UK, despite the whole apparatus of the state and
establishment being directed to preventing this happening. How much of Trumps reputed $10 billion went
on buying him into power and how much was provided by those who can call in their
debts will never be known. The reality is that he now able to use his knowledge
and skill which got him into power to stay there for at least 8 years. If he succeeds in his approach I foresee
several changes to the USA constitution including the maximum tenure of any
individual in office.
As commander and Chief he can use the power as an elected head of state
in much the same way as Hitler did in Germany. We may also never know who put
up the British PM to engineer the visit to see Trump and if this came from him via
Farage. It could have come from within Europe as the price for an eventual soft
Brexit and to get Trump to make positive public noises about NATO and to hold
him back from doing open public deals with Putin. It could have been from panic because the
information about the reality of past and current UK and USA intrigue, under
cover deals, are now to known to the new President. It was one of a series of
major political blinders which the May Premiership is making.
There is no doubt that the President is determined to do what he said he
would do and to do it quickly before the system organises to prevent him. The
idea that he needs someone like the PM in the way Regan needed Thatcher is
absurd, in the same way the idea that the Queen can be expected to have any
influence is dangerous. Trump is what he is and has never made any secret of it
just as Jimmy Saville was open about his behaviour and a wide range of people
looked the other way.
So far there has been a partial awakening to the implications of leaving
the umbrella of Europe and the implications of a Trump presidency. The response
of the Labour Party which has the risk of imploding has been excellent for once
recognising the enemy without and the outburst from Speaker Bercow timely. The
boat could be rocked further and even off course when the Lord out amendments
to the Brexit Bill and it would be great if they force the government to hold a
General Election to abolish the second chamber. Anyone who claims to know or be
certain about the outcome of the Brexit referendum on the implication for British
citizens of Trump’s triumph is a fool. I am still of view of a May General
Election.
No comments:
Post a Comment