Reviewing my writings this month the causal reader can be forgiven for concluding that I am fixated on crime and cricket so this time I am including a birth who will become an heredity head of state, plus Kenneth Branagh as Macbeth as well as looking back on Helen Mirren’s tour de force as Queen Elizabeth all part of a visit to the midlands which included Durham County Cricket Club at Nottingham and the second Test match at Lords (TV and radio).
First the Duchess of Cambridge with the assistance of William (second in line to become heredity head of state) has produced an eight pound plus boy, George Alexander Louis and who will be 87 in the year 2100 long after I have departed worldly and I suspect all self awareness.
I have previously declared my opposition to an aristocracy and all that goes with it, despite the arguments about stability and continuity of the British form of government. I have not changed my position on the principle that aristocracy, royalty and an heredity head of state are incompatible with any rational notion of democracy, but then again I have never argues that life, politics and human behaviour is guided primarily by rationality.
However the sooner titles are abolished in Britain the better for all of us in the creation of more balanced society, balance of payments via the tourist industry not withstanding. Having said this I have warmed to the idea of an heredity head of state in terms of providing a ceremonial role embodying the core values of the state as long as each individual is appropriately trained and given the option on reaching maturity of opting out and choosing another occupation and lifestyle if they wish and once the decision is taken rather like religious leaders of old then they should be regarded as an apprentice and provided experience of the people they will lead as well of the job required and which also brings me to the play, the Audience with Helen Mirren, as the Queen, looking back on her life and the experience of the weekly audience with all the Prime Ministers she got to know since the untimely death of her father.
Looking back over the same period I conclude that Mrs Simpson did the nation a great favour by seducing the then King into wanting to marry her, thus causing the abdication and with that the succession of George VI and our Elizabeth. I hate to imagine what would have become of Britain had the Archbishop of Canterbury and other big wigs decided that the King and Mrs Simpson should get their way.
George VI and his wife carried out their required role with dedication, honour, integrity and distinction and acquired the love, admiration and respect of the majority of the British people together with large chunks of the population worldwide, paving the way for Queen Elizabeth to commence her long and illustrious reign with her admirable husband although more than once the British system has been under threat and the position of the heredity head of state placed in question.
There is evidence that twice during the period when Harold Wilson was Prime Minister a military and secret service coup was attempted proposing that Louis Mountbatten should head a government of unity. Harold, who I head speak about the way science and technology would transform the country during the period when I was at the University of Birmingham was according to the play, the Queen favourite Prime Minister because of his direct no nonsense approach to politics and life.
Baron Wilson as he became was clever with a photographic memory but without arrogance or unscrupulousness and double dealing and was the only Prime Minister other than Churchill who the Queen honoured by going to dine at his home before both departed office. For at least a couple of decades mystery surrounded the reasons for Wilson’s unexpected departure from office and in is only latterly that the truth emerged that he developed the early indicators of Alzheimer’s as well as his wife’s distaste for party politics and the then increasing cult of personality politics.
To his credit Louis Mountbatten who had tried to keep India as one country, when Viceroy rejected, the coup proposal and he is said to have encouraged the marriage between Philip and Elizabeth as well as becoming an important influence on the life of Prince Charles. The decision of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge to including Louis as one of the three names for their first born maybe more of a nod towards Prince Charles than a statement of Europeanism but I was delighted that this choice of name did upset one little Englander.
While the Queen is shown to have respected Winston Churchill, played by Edward Fox in the play, it is evident that she was somewhat in awe of a man who clung to his traditional understanding of the role while with Wilson she appears to have been able to be herself or at least come to be herself having been thrust into the role prematurely and without the years of preparation afforded to Charles, William and hopefully to George, adjusting to the outward changing nature of the Kingdom without abandoning the core values.(I have the life of Winston by his son Randolph)
Queen Elizabeth was fortunate to have the remarkable Harold Macmillan (I have Anthony Sampson’s study of his Political Ambiguity), the man who advised South Africa on the Winds of Change but who helped the cover up of upper class immorality in the Profumo Affair and which led to an unholy alliance between the secret service, the police and fleet street to blame Stephen Ward. The Judge at the time has no business promising anonymity to witnesses beyond that required by statute hence the continuing clamour to have the papers, fortunately not destroyed as intended, available for professional scrutiny in much the same way as those relating to the covering up of Hillsborough. I am not suggesting there is a difference between upper and lower class immorality or indeed taking a position on what is regarded as immorality but not illegal. I see no value in pandering to the interest of the mob and the only outstanding issue is whether matters were covered up with it was in the public interest in terms of the then law to have processed.
The play showed that Anthony Eden was unfit for the office( I have his Memoirs- Full circle) as well as those of another unsuitable man Edward Heath (George Hutchinson’s book) but I cannot find the study on Wilson although I did find Mrs Wilson Dairy as well as the spirited defence of her husband and the scandalous lies put about by hostile individuals in MI5, in a surprising article which appeared the Daily Mail’s on line edition of Femail.
The play suggests that the Queen found/continues to find it difficult to forgive the decision of Tony Blair to sell off the Royal Yacht and not to commission a replacement or the way he took control of the situation arising from the death of Diana, although not featured in the play, may well have affected the rest of their relationship together with the decisions to use ground troops in Iraq. There was surprising affection for Prime Minister Brown I suspect because the Scottish connection, and common values, together with the most interesting exchanges, confrontation, is too strong a word between the first female Prime Minister and a Queen born in the same year. It is interesting that an almost state funeral took place for Lady Thatcher with the Royals attending, something unlikely for Tony Blair.
In the play the meetings with each Prime Minister was interspersed with Elizabeth reflecting on her life as a young girl and young woman and together with some amazing changes of costumes and physical appearance the show provided an always engaging and rounded perspective on our national life over six decades. It was a good experience with my only regret that I was not able to view live because the theatre at Bolden failed to sort out the communications link with the NT effectively beforehand.
The decision of the Duchess of Cambridge to go and stay with her “ordinary” parents, albeit southern counties middle class, is a good move as was the move to name their first child George. Prince George also has the name of Alexander with the suggestion that was the wish of his mother, the Duchess of Cambridge and is indeed a great name!
In the context of the Audience it is hoped that Charles, William and now George will be adequately prepared for their future roles as understudies and one step could be to include the next in line in the weekly Audience, although weekly is a misnomer as appears not to take place when the head of state is on holiday although presumably direct contact is possible through the use of Skype and the telephone, presuming these can not be monitored by the various intelligence services, including our own.
The Queen has had her horrible years, caused by an unfortunate choice of someone to marry the man who will become Charles III when he was already in a lifelong loving relationship with another woman who has subsequently become his wife. Given the nature of the continuing British establishment the individualistic Charles espousing many causes of significance could prove a workable interim head of state as long as his wife continues to play the supporting role she has developed since their marriage, giving William and Kate more time for each other and for a family life before they become modern heads of state hopefully abolishing the wearing of robes on state occasions such as the Opening of the Parliament and other inappropriate dressing up in such a way as not to damage the tourist value of our ceremonies. It was good to see Republican channels such as Fox News and CCN and France Today providing wall to wall coverage of the birth.
The potential sealing up of an hereditary head of state for the next 100 years should prevent the kind of treachery which Shakespeare covers in his play Macbeth which I saw late (8.30 PM) in a live relay from Manchester at the Odeon Cinema Mansfield.
I studied the play for my ordinary level English Literature General Certificate of education and the words remain familiar to me. Perhaps for this reason it has never been a work which emotionally engaged although I continue to marvel at language with its insight on the human condition even only some murderers are subsequently racked with the kind of guilt which beset Macbeth and his wife played by the excellent Alex Kingston (who recently had a good role in Doctor Who and also who also was a subject of a Who do you think you are programme. At one level I have seen and enjoyed Kenneth Branagh in too many roles, especially Wallander on screen over past half decade to see him as Macbeth, although the performance was of the highest integrity.
The reason why this couple sowed the seeds of their own doom is that he listened to the three witches and failed to remember “beware the Greeks who bear the gifts” while his wife liked the idea of being queen and initiated the subsequent ruthlessness. The National Theatre production took place in a deconsecrated church with the stage the central aisle although some use was made of window and settings of the alter end. There was one memorable performance that of Ray Fearon as McDuff whose reaction to the news of the death of his wife and sons was one of the most painfully moving experience in theatre for the past decade and which followed the excellent performance of Rosalie Craig as his wife and Harry Polden and Pip Pearce as their sons. John Shapriel as Duncan always impresses as did Jimmy Yuill as Banquo. The late start was because the play, as is customary, is played straight for its two hours in length without an interval, There was no vacant seats and the Premium seating was excellent for someone of my size.
It was my second visit to the site of the cinema in consecutive days although my first visit was unintended and I will explain in the second piece of writing about the midlands weekender.
No comments:
Post a Comment