Sunday, 3 November 2019

Reflections on Brexit and the unsolved murder of Ann Haldane on a visit to London by train


At the age of eighty, travelling has become a challenge, but a return first class train day journey from Newcastle to London was booked in the fourth week of October to mark finding that the murder of a former friend, Ann Haldane, stabbed to death in a Soho Street on Tuesday October 22nd 1963 has remained unsolved despite an estimated seventy people surrounding her body as she died, and a dozen of these, according to the Inquest papers held at the London Metropolitan Archives, being able to give a description of the killer and the direction in which he walked away. 


As the day of the visit approached, Thursday October 24th,  I considered visiting the House of Commons for what was to have been an historic day when the legislation required before entering into a treaty with 27 other European sovereign nations to leave the European political and economic community of 28 nations would receive its third reading before consideration in the House of Lords over the weekend, a one hour report stage before being given its Royal assent in time for the British to have signed the Treaty before 1st of November. In the event the time table for considering the legislation was rejected and my visit to the crime scene was brief because of heavy rain. I went to an impressive Disney film again, in 3D, had a  half pint of lager at the Parcel’s Yard at Kings Cross Station before watching the proceedings in House of Commons  in the first class lounge at the station and after an enjoyable meal on the homeward journey witnessed a potentially serious physical confrontation between two men and their partners on Metro train journey back to South Shields finding later that  was but one of several recent acts of violence on this part of the Tyneside and Wearside Metro train system according to reports in the Shields Gazette and the Newcastle Evening Chronicle. 


Although I enjoyed many aspects of the journey and visit, I was left with the feeling of failure and inadequacy which has affected much of my life over the past three decades. The impotence of being unable to influence events for the better.


Since writing these words the people in the British Home nations know that the most important general election since that in 1945 will take place on December 12th  and I need to finish or interrupt a number of activities so that I can devote the greater part of each day to help the Labour Party which I first joined in Wallington in 1960 to form the next government and where my friend Ann Haldane had joined the separate young socialists before me. 


On Saturday October 19th , four days before my journey, the House of Commons voted by 322-306 to delay further consideration of the proposed legislation to implement the proposed Leave Treaty and new political declaration. The significant development then, and still, is that  the  Democratic Unionist Party supported the delay because of betrayal of the commitment given by Boris Johnson to their annual conference that he would not support either the existing proposed back stop insurance requirement, or a border along the Irish sea between Northern Ireland and the three mainland home nations. This commitment together with the promise to leave the community before November 1st had been a factor in being elected Prime Minister by the Tory Party membership as the other candidate, former Health and Foreign Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, had been honest in admitting that given the composition of the House of Commons getting agreement which would satisfy the Commons before the latest  date agreed with the Community could not be guaranteed.


The usual procedure after such a vote has taken place is for the Leaders of the political parties to use a Point of Order to explain their position in the light of the decision. In this instance the Prime Minister remained defiant and determined, which did not surprise, but the action of the Leader of the House of Commons, the cultured, erudite and eccentric  Jacob Rees-Mogg, used the same procedure to announce the abandonment of business planned for Monday, which he had  announced on Thursday there would be further debates on the government programme, and instead there would another attempt the end the Parliament with a General Election on December 12th.  In terms of the procedures of the Commons the Speaker resisted ruling the move disorderly as notice if the intention to change the programme had not been given.


The motion to delay giving approval in principle to the proposed Withdrawal agreement until the legislation had published, considered and passed, meant that the Prime Minister was required to seek a third extension  writing  a letter which had been set out under legislation which the House of Commons had successfully passed as  a private member backbench Act, and which the Prime Minister and leading members of the Cabinet describe as the Surrender Act.  His response reinforced the view of a juvenile mentality and unfitness for a public office, let alone that of Prime Minister. He sent the letter without his signature accompanied by a formal letter of explanation, and a third explaining his continuing opposition to delay and wish to Leave  before November 1st.

Moreover, it quickly emerged that there would be a future programme motion would ensure that the legislation passed in the Commons by Thursday, then to the House of Lords, sitting  over the weekend if necessary  with an hour to consider any Lords’ amendments  on Monday followed by seeking Royal Assent.


On Sunday, October 20th, Sir Kier Starmer, the Labour Party’s brilliant architect of its policy, strategy and tactics towards exiting the European, confirmed on the Andrew Marr Show,  the continuing consistent approach the Party has taken since agreed at its annual conference, and detailed the flaws in the proposed Treaty and withdrawal legislation. Although Leaving  with transitional arrangement which ruled out no deal appeared proposed, if  the future trade agreement with the Community is not agreed by June 2020, the government could then choose to leave without a deal, and the majority in the Commons subsequently rejected the oral  assurance that the Commons would be consulted before such a move was taken. The government were also pretending that there would be no  administrative border between Northern Ireland and the three homeland other nations, and the proposed simple majority required in the  future devolved Parliament changed the terms if the Good Friday agreement which effectively required both Unionist and Nationalist Parties to agree before any changes to legislation are agreed. This paved the way for the administrative border to become indefinite and a referendum for an all-Ireland Government likely as it does for a new referendum for full independence in Scotland which voted significantly in favour of remain and the Tory Government promised  that remaining part of Britain meant membership of the European Community was also confirmed.

For me, the most important point which Sir Keir made and one which I had not previously been sure he fully appreciated, is that the intention of Nigel Farage and the Brexit Party, as it is of the United Kingdom Independence Party, other right wing Parties and movements, the core membership of European Research Group of the Tory Party, those engaged in Global Finance and business, to pursue low corporate taxation, limited or no trade union and general worker’s rights similar to that in the United States of North America, admirably exposed  by Simon Reeve in his present series of travels highlighting the level of homelessness in Los Angeles, the use of slave illegal migrant labour in the Californian valley, and polices which  help to put into question the future of the earth planet. This political difference is  more important than if we are part of  the political structure of the European Community. 


In 1962, I represented Ruskin College on a committee of the Oxford University Labour Party formed to oppose British entry into the Common Market  because it was evidently working to promote an uncontrolled and unplanned market economy for the already richest countries on the continent. The committee was short lived because General De Gaulle, President of France said Non. 


At the same time my study of history suggested that a united states of all Europe with a  European defence organisation was a long term necessity if military conflict within Europe was to be avoided. The need to avoid the kind of death and destruction Europe has experienced for centuries leading to the first and second would wars within three decades of the first half of the twentieth century has affected all of us with direct experience.


Having said this, the reason why I accept it is necessary that we leave the present political union,  hopefully for only a matter years  rather than decades, at the same time as developing and strengthening all other relationships, it because the British electorate was told without any ifs or buts, changes in political or economic circumstances,  the referendum decision would be respected and implemented.  Failure to leave the political aspects of the community, severely undermines British democracy  and fuels right wing extremism,  and the scapegoating of races, and any deviating from was is politically determined as the acceptable norm.


In the mid 1980’s after attending an international senior management course, it was evident from the factual information provided that the move towards a globalized economy and global trading alliances would accelerate and that the European  economic structure would need to be strengthened if we were to retain income and expenditure standards as  the trading economies in other parts of the world also strengthened.  I circulated  a paper on the issue, including to Michael Heseltine the Member for Henley on Thames where the management college I located, which  impressed him sufficiently to write a personal letter  saying he was circulating widely  in Whitehall.  I received a letter of interest from the Human Resources Director at the Department of Defence, which given my background I still find amusing.


The solution to the economic and political aspects of our future relationship with Europe is that worked out by Sir Keith and the Labour Party at his annual conference two years ago and which continues to be the position with the commitment to hold a confirmation referendum to leave the political union but not the economic union, together with the option to formally ask to Remain.


The successful alliance between the Labour Party, the Scottish National Party, the Liberal Democrats, the Greens, together with members of other parties and those who have  become independents to prevent  leaving without a transitional period and an agreed in advance basis for future trading and other relationships, was always destined to break down, once the immediate threat of no deal was removed and this has been so.  It was also evident that the failure to Leave on March 31st would impact on the European elections and on any General election held before leaving with or without a deal. However, I did not fear an early general election as long as there was no pact between the Tory, Brexit and UKIP parties to concentrate on winning Labour Party and Lib Dem held or likely to be won seats.


The Scottish Nationalist Party know that the resignation of Tory Leader in Scotland Ruth Davison coupled with a rogue politically creative maniac of a Prime Minister and his political guru Dominic Cummings, should result in the departure of every Scottish Tory Party Member and that in the event of  a minority Labour Government Jeremy Corbyn would not stand in the way of a second independence reference although it is in Labour’s interest for Scotland to remain in the Union, and for Labour to  gain seats from the Nationalists as well as the Conservatives. Labour needs to gain House of Commons seats in Scotland to establish and overall majority and a Labour Government remaining part of the Customs Unions Union should be able  to offer a new devolution deal which  could encourage the Scottish nationalists delaying  putting the issue to a new independence referendum. As with the DUP money talks and binds.


It is also evident that the inexperienced new leader of the Liberal Democrats is an opportunist who still hopes to build on the summer success of appealing to the undemocratic Remainers, especially once it was evident that majority of the Remainers, and anti-Corbyn and John McDonnell  members of the Parliamentary Labour Party were not  going to attempt to form a centrist new party.  Once 19 members of the Parliamentary Labour Party voted for the second reading of the Withdrawal Bill, the Liberal Dems and Scottish Nationalists had no choice but to go for a general election and once this was signalled, it forced Boris to stop bluffing, accept no deal and gamble that Nigel Farage would hesitate before contesting every Tory seat.


Contrary to the majority of political commentators the outline of the general election result can be predicted as long as there is no secret deal between Johnson and Farage to limit the damage in England and Wales. In Scotland perhaps one or two conservatives will survive because of local factors and personalities but the more likely none will,  and the issue is whether Labour can gain some of these as well as retaining those presently held. In Wales the position is likely to remain as it is now overall. In Northern Ireland the position of Unionists will be strengthened depending on the present demographics with Catholic Nationalists. The Liberal democrats will gain seats from the Tories in the South West and may also do so in London. The Tories will not gain seats in the North but could gain a few seats in the Midlands. 


My present predication is therefore no Party will be in overall control, but Labour will hold the largest number of seats sufficient to form a minority government, and be given the time by the European Community to negotiate the terms of a new treaty and for time to put this in a referendum with the option to remain by the revocation if Article 50. The outcome of such a referendum cannot be predicted. 


It is also possible that in these circumstances a Minority Labour Government could continue to function and implement the less controversial aspects of its manifesto.


One factor will be to get the Northern Ireland Assembly up and running and offer the Executive, the Parliaments in Scotland and Wales more powers and more money.


Alongside I believe the priority should be to transfer back to the local  councils the funds required to develop  the social  and community health care,  education and housing programmes together with  the youth service, and community policing. Only if the election result is an overall majority  should the emphasis be on bringing  Rail, Water and the Post Office into a new form  of public and employee ownership unless agreement can be reached with Libs Dems and other centrist groupings in the Commons.


However,  Corbyn  will grow personally in stature until the Tories are able and willing to replace Boris if he has not immediately surrendered  after losing the election. The decision to revoke article 50 will lead to a new right wing party being created from the Tory, Brexit and UKIP memberships and could see the end of the present Tory Party.


The unpredictable aspect is the actual door step and campaigning power of the Labour Party’s membership, the extent to which  the limitations of Boris and the inexperience of Ms Swinson are exposed and the honesty, openness and integrity of Jeremy Corbyn can withstand and overcome the  unscrupulous behind the scenes  interventions  led by the Russian, Chinese, USA and Israeli  political leaders who all fear a real democratic  socialist party gaining political power in one of the top economically powerful countries.


Despite the rain, it was important to revisit the Dean Street in Soho and the place were Ann Haldane was murdered in October 1963, having decided to suspend writing about what is know to have happened while I continue to digest the new information  arising from meetings held on the afternoon and evening of Friday September 13th,  the decision to advise a contact  in London’s Metropolitan police appointed to review the  available documentation and deciding if to change the focus of the autobiographical work and possible refer the latest information to those with resources to assess whether the new information changes the perspective that I had developed.


The visit also provided the opportunity to experience the new carriages of Azuma trains, what were to have been the flagships of Virgin  before the failure of its  service from London to the North East and Scotland. The first difference was the absence of reserved seat tickets tucked into the back of each seat, replaced by digital indicators which only  indicate the current position of the seat and not the  sequence of occupants.  I was allocated an aisle forward seat at a table  of four with someone about to sit immediately facing me deciding to find  someone else with the outcome that I was left  on my own for the whole journey.


The other new feature is a TV screen at each end of the carriage which provides updated information on stations, times and connections, plus news headlines and offers. On the way back we were given minute by minute changes to the amount of delay which reached 16 minutes before Darlington  and was around 13 minutes on arrival.


There is also a new “Let’s dine” first class menu booklet choosing the full LNER breakfast with Yorkshire sausage and Yorkshire bacon, baked beans, a flat mushroom, hash brown and fried egg. I had to wait sometime as priority was given to the bacon rolls. Fortunately, a round of brown toast with marge and marmalade arrived quickly  and I enjoyed  two more rounds later and three coffees. 


I had already seen the Disney film mistitled Maleficent, Mistress of Evil as a Superscreen, surround sound, production at the Cineworld in Newcastle and as no film other film appealed, the opportunity was taken to see the film again in 3D which continues to impress as the film medium of first choice, although if I could cope, 4DX is better. I have recently experienced 270 degree screen vision for the second time, with Gemini Man, concluding that the sensory overland was not enjoyable and distracted. There was only one other individual for 1 pm showing so and the film the 3D production did not disappoint with a good balance between the sense of depth with appropriate out of screen moments. I was struck by the similarities of the cavernous world of the winged creatures able to transform their appearance  and the hidden world in the  last “How to Train Your Dragon” film. The other thought was if  the impact of today’s cinematic digital technology still caused the same wonder as the transformation of Kansas into the world of Oz which the 1939 film had on me.

I arrived back at the Kings Cross St Pancras combined underground train system making by way to one end of St Pancras station unintentionally and passing the entrance to the high speed trains into Europe noted  about thirty police in attendance some with powerful automatic weapons and wondered is this was usual  or because of some new threat intelligence. No one appeared spooked by the number and people were eating out and also listening to two pianists playing  at different ends of the station ground level. I did some shopping in Boots and looked around Marks and Spencer debating to buy some food, not having eaten since mid-morning, I changed my mind and on crossing over to Kings Cross decided I would enjoy a lager beer, making my way to the Parcel’s Yard where I  had to drink the half  in a corridor seat before a table became available. 


I cannot visit the Parcel’s yard without reflecting on the visit made on January 2nd 2014, and meeting two members of the group where the senior politician involved, Tom Watson, deputy Leader of the Labour party  is under fire because he, the police and others were taken in by someone who made serious allegation against prominent politicians past and present and which led to one of the major police operation involved  in the investigation and reinvestigation of past allegations of child abuse.  From third party information, some well-informed, I have never doubted that some politicians were directly involved, but went on record in writing to the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee,  those organising the People’s Tribunal and whoever care to listen that some of the men making allegations should be treated with caution and that the emphasis on national politicians could deflect from investigating and understanding, the scale, the causes and the lifelong effects of the abuse. On January 2nd, 2014, I spent four  hours with both individuals and a further two hours with one, before over the next 48 hours working out what to do next and  halting my ongoing work of the Artman 101 Installation. It was another two years before deciding to undertake the research required for an autobiography, nd wondering if the murder of Ann Haldane had been brought to justice.


Moving to the First class lounge class lounge, I made do with coffees, a treacle muffin, a banana and tried three small packets of different corn snacks  at same time as trying to hear what was being said in the House of Commons as Government’s legislation and policy programme was formally agreed.


On the train, a couple were already seated at the table facing me in the allocated seat, but I found a vacant two seat table mid carriage. As the train was about to depart a man who I recognised as a Conservative Party junior Minister considered taking the vacant seat, looked me over, and then decided to see what else was available so the opportunity for an interesting exchange of views was missed. Rishi Sunak, the Member of Parliament for Richmond has been chief secretary at the Treasury since July. He took over the seat from William Hague, was head boy at Winchester, obtained a degree in Philosophy Politics Economics at Lincoln College, Oxford, became a Fulbright scholar at Stanford in US of North America, and went into Hedge fund management before politics. This Sunday he appeared on the Andrew Marr show on behalf of the Tory alternative to the Farage version of  hard Brexit, who also appeared with John McDonnell.


I enjoyed the summer chicken casserole, having a pre-prandial whisky with ginger on the rocks, followed by another post prandial and a diet Pepsi after York. I had another treacle muffin noting the advertised creamy vanilla filling and a packet of crisps with the first of the drinks. 


It was just before eleven when the train ended its journey at Newcastle, and I spotted that one of train crew had left their blazer which did not belong to any of team departing the carriage before me. I was therefore pleased with myself on going to the platform via the lift as the  escalator was stopped and was relaxed until Jarrow  when two couples entering the  carriage started to get into an aggressive confrontation both men squaring up. One couple departed at Tyne Dock where the driver came out of his cab  to observe the remaining male hammering hard at the door in frustration. This couple then departed at Chichester. At South Shields the driver confirmed he had reported the incident which I assumed had also been filmed on the carriage camera. I made my way out of the  brilliant new Metro and bus station noting that the all night coach to London had already departed remembering the occasion when with my eldest daughter we joined at the Washington Service area the overnight coach from Newcastle to London and made our way to Wembley Stadium to attend the British part of Live Aid. At the age of eighty there is a tendency to see the present through the lens of the past and debate the decisions and choices made and review the experiences enjoyed and those not.

Tuesday, 15 October 2019

Waiting for Brexit playing Microsoft Solitaire

On Tuesday afternoon, October 15th  2019 I achieved the 100 successful completion of 390 World Events played on Microsoft Solitaire Game Collection. There were only five games instead of the usual 20 or 30 and only two levels of difficulty,  Easy and Medium, none at Hard or Expert. I have only finished twice in the top ten of the allocated group of 100 other players worldwide, with an average 450000 participating and 24 occasions finishing in the top 25 because I spread play throughout the 34 hours of the event. In this instance taking 9 mins and 36 seconds compered to the present leader at 3 mins 53 and the 82nd at over 36 minutes.

In  2016 I commenced to play the first of over 1000 Daily Challenges  which cover the four levels of difficulty and the five types of Solitaire games Classic Solitaire Klondike where I have become a Grandmaster of the second level winning 97% of the 662 games  played, as I have at Spider, winning 98% of 627; with first level Grandmaster achieved  in Pyramid 82% of 268 games and a Tri Peak with 76% of 347 games. My favourite game  is Free Cell where Grandmaster level 5 has been attained with 98% of the 926 games played won.

In 43 of the months of play all four bronze, silver, gold and diamond badges were attained, the exception the first three months until I worked out how to play the games of greater difficulty. Because of the time usually required to  complete an expert level game in only nine instances has the Perfect level been attained in a month, completing all 150 or 155 games in the month, and four of these this year to-date.

When I commenced to play Solitaire games, as a break from computer chess, the focus was on the Star Club unlocking 93 packs in five collections of  a total of 954 have been completed, 83% of the total available, earning 1749 stars and 70 crowns.

Monday, 7 October 2019

Britain's future depends on Jeremy Corbyn becoming Prime Minister


.

Laura Pidcock,  Chris Peace, Chi Onwurah, Lauren Dingsdale, supported by Nick Brown, Ian Lavery and Jeremey Corbyn at  Newcastle City Hall, Saturday October 5th, 2019


For four years, I have warned that the wealth and power of national and international, financial and other business interests, combined with the latest 1984 micro surveillance and communications control technology, would do whatever was considered necessary to further a British “American Dream” using the criminal, the personally ambitious, the racists and the misogynists to further their cause. For the past three years I also warned that divisions within the Labour party over Brexit, international and defence policy and between neo liberal and socialist economics, would prevent Jeremey Corbyn becoming Prime Minister of a socialist leaning government. 


As I told members of Jeremy’s campaign team in 2015, although I agreed with everything proposed in his prospectus to be leader, I was not going to vote for him for two reasons. The most important was that it was time for a power shift from men to women in general and for the Labour Party in particular. I also feared that that Jeremy’s Parliamentary and Public record of consistent international peace making, opposition to all forms of racism, support for anyone the subject of injustice and unwillingness to compromise political principles would divide the Party, given that the majority of those elected to House of Commons or awarded seats in the  House of Lords accepted international capitalism, the structure and approach of the British ruling institutions and had become out of touch with the response of the native white working class to the open borders of  the enlarged European Community. 


The only thing which surprised me about the result of the 2016 referendum was that the majority to leave was not greater, given the impact of the planned austerity, the extent to which Nigel Farage played the race card and Tory Party leavers promoted the kind of retrospective nationalism which combined with racism had brought Hitler to power over most of Europe.


As I have also continued to remind of what became evident when attending in the mid 1980’s, a four week international senior general management course at Henley, the hatred of those working at director level in both public companies and former nationalized utilities of public services with principles and standards; the wisdom of moving headquarters to countries with stable governments and low corporation taxation rates and moving production units to countries with stable governments and little or no trade unionism to keep wages low; the need for world wide relationships with competitors to minimise the power of individual governments; a contempt for politicians who could be bought; and the importance of strengthening the European trading mechanism in the context of the development of the other international trading blocks and the emergence of China as a world dominating economic power.  I spent six months digesting the components of the course, ending with an overview  paper, sending a copy to Michael Heseltine, the Member of Parliament for Henley on Thames and a lifelong European. To my surprise  he not only replied but said he was distributing copies throughout Whitehall just before he resigned from Office. I received one follow up response from the Human Resources Director at the Ministry of Defence in relation to the historically proven reality that political, financial, business, social projects will all fail in their stated objectives unless you are able to recruit those who share, are committed, and trained to achieve the objectives.


Teresa May, who had shown strength of character and courage during her tenure as Home Secretary, took the right  decision to call a General Election in 2017, knowing that she had little prospect of getting a balanced deal with Europe over leaving the European Community without being able to combat those who formed the European Research Group within the House of Commons and reducing the evident opposition from the Labour and Liberal democrat parties for Remain, Ending the threat posed by Jeremy Corbyn was only one factor. She evidently underestimated, as Tony Blair and others have since admitted, the personal ability of Jeremy  to communicate with people, based on his proven record  and coupled with the growing awareness among well educated, thoughtful, responsible and caring people of all ages and backgrounds, that change was needed and that the re-emergence of the kind and level of politics which brought Donald Trump to power in the United States of North America had to resisted.


It is clearly evident that Mrs May failure has brought the British people to a moment in our history where the choice is between Government by those of the dark or by those of  the light. It is as simple as that.


It would be wrong to be carried away by the fact that 2000 people in the North East accepted the invitation to listen to Jeremey Corbyn at Newcastle’s Civic Hall on Saturday, learning of the meeting on the Monday and of the venue on Friday and arrived in their hundreds over an hour before scheduled time and then queued for upwards of hour along opposite directions of Northumberland Street just to make the point we know difference between an honest man and a self-interest unscrupulous liar. 


The odds, it has to be admitted are still stacked against us, and putting off the General Election is essential until we leave the EEC with no deal at the end of October, the present most likely outcome, or achieve a delay which should see the Tory Party old order rid  themselves of Boris, and where I can  still see Mrs May, Jeremey Hunt, Phil Hammond back in temporary charge.


The two aspects of the meeting on Saturday which gives me hope, was the repeated applause when the platform speakers echoed Jo Cox, there is more that unites than divides, and we will not let the passionately held differences about Brexit derail the issues to be decided at the next General Election, and secondly the strength and quality of the next generation of Labour women ministers.


The first speaker was the Laura Pidcock, first elected as the Member of Parliament for North West Durham in 1997 and appointed Shadow Minister of State for Business, Energy and Industrial strategy in January of last year whose prepared speech was delivered in a manner which matched the mood of the audience as well as saying what we wanted to hear, following on from the electric, passionate and empathetic mood throughout the Brighton conference.


The response of those sitting immediately around me was one of WOW, this is someone who will be at the forefront of the Party in the future.  Back home I discovered that Laura comes from a political family and that as a child she attended demonstrations against Thatcher and apartheid, obtained a degree in politics at Manchester University and in 2012 completed a master’s degree in Disaster Management and Sustainable Development. 


I have spoken with Chris Peace, Labour’s candidate to win the marginal seat of North East Derbyshire before and who at present is the Cabinet Member for Health and Care on Sheffield City Council . We had  a chat at the entrance to Big Meeting as she handed  out leaflets and pressing for support for an independent inquiry into Orgreave, which Jeremey announced from the platform later that day and Diane Abbot will announce on her first day in office as Home Secretary. Chris is a qualified teacher who then qualified as a criminal lawyer.


It was also good to hear again Nick Brown, who spoke at a Momentum members meeting in Newcastle several years ago. He has been chief whip for Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and  for Jeremy since 2016 and since then has organised parliamentary defeats against Cameron and May before  achieving defeats for every vote  Boris has attempted since  the Tory party chose him to destroy the One Nation party. Nick, a southerner like me, by birth, also went to Manchester University, moving to Tyneside in 1978 when appointed legal adviser to the GMB and elected a Newcastle City councillor in 1980,  before his election as Newcastle East M.P. after the sitting member defected to the SDP. His role in keeping the Parliamentary Party together should not be underestimated.


Ian Lavery, the Wansbeck Northumberland MP  who  is one of the proud sons of Ashington along with the footballing Millburns and Charltons  and cricketing Harmisons and Mark Wood among many others. He has been Chairman of the Labour Party since 2017 and is one of two National Campaign Coordinators, a role for which he is well fitted. He is very much traditional North East Labour of the kind who made my life as a chief officer for 18 years difficult although I never forgot that such individuals reflected the reality of the life of the men in their communities.


After the interval, the tone of the meeting changed, because of two of Labour’s highly intelligent future female Ministers. The Member of Parliament  for Newcastle central, Chi Onwurah, is not a natural soap box campaigner but is one of several Labour Shadow women Ministers with interesting backgrounds. Her Newcastle born mother married an educated Nigerian who successfully studied to become a dentist at the Newcastle University Medical school back in the 1950’s when racism in the North East  and other industrial northern towns was strong.  Born  in Wallsend, then in Northumberland, and now North Tyneside, she went with her parents to Nigeria in 1965, a few months after her birth, returning with her mother two years later when the Biafran War commenced, her father joining the Biafran Army. In 1987 she graduated from Imperial College London with a degree in Electrical Engineering, I believe one of the few qualified engineers in the House of Commons, working on both hardware and software development and with work experience in the United States, Demark, France and Nigeria while also studying for a master’s in business studies at the Manchester Business School.


Chi is one of Tyne and Wearside Members Parliament, also rooted in the traditional trade union and Labour movements of the North East, a firm supporter of Remain, supporting Andy Burnham and the Owen Smith in the two leadership campaigns and this was recognised by the initial response of the audience to her contribution compared to those speaking before her. My impression is that people did listen to the wisdom of what she said, underlining that despite strongly held differences in approach  and on individual  issues  we had to come together to achieve a Labour Government.  


I knew nothing of the speaker, Lauren Dingsdale, chosen to introduce Jeremey, the Labour candidate for Conservative held seat of Middlesbrough and South East Cleveland, whose diminutive youthful appearance masks a powerful intelligent political brain which saw her gain more than twice the votes at selection than a local woman councillor. Lauren also trained as a lawyer after graduating from Oxford with a degree in Philosophy, Politics and with help from throughout the region should quickly become a member of the extended government team.


Risking the commentators curse, ever since Boris was elected the Tory Party Leader and assumed the office of Prime Minister, Jeremy in both manner and what he has said, looks a man who knows he will be the next Prime Minister because of the hundreds of thousands of individual members of the Labour Party who will do what is required to ensure that he is. This explains the willingness of the Scottish Nationalist Party to work with him but not the Liberal Democrats, who  fear as much as the Tories, that once in position  as temporary Prime Minister to prevent a No Deal Brexit, the myth created as  Bogey man will be ended and the Lib Dem hopes of spearheading a new centre right party will also end. 


The message  given by the 2000 who queued around  Newcastle Civic Hall for an hour or more on Saturday is that come the General Election 2000 will become 200000 thousand and counting.

Thursday, 5 September 2019

The next move of of the Prime Minister and his advisors

It is reported that the Prime Minister is visiting the British Head of State this weekend. Has he been summoned to explain himself or more liking will he ask  for the prorogation to be extended  to November 1st if General election is not  agreed for October 15th?

Brexit, an informed forecast of what will happen next


    

As BBC and Sky news channels debate this morning what will happen next, the Robert Peston, ITV programme of 4th September 2019 contained interviews with Boris Johnson, John McDonnell and Ian Blackford and important commentaries on what they said by Dominic Grieve and Jess Phillips after the House of Commons refused to accept the General Election date of October 15th and passed the Bill seeking a further extension to avoid No deal.

A number of statements were made in the programme which coupled with what was said and observed during Prime Minister’s Question Time, what transpired to be the autumn election spending statement, consideration of the Stop No deal Bill and General Election Debate 12 a.m. to 10 p.m, which I believe makes clear the latest position and what will happen between now and Monday or even later, if the government holds off Prorogation 


All future measures presented Parliament by the Johnson government will be opposed and defeated, including the proposed Queens Speech, with the exception of an amendable legislative measure to abolish the Fixed Parliament Act which the government is likely to introduce if it is known the Commons will agree that the date of the General Election can be fixed without alteration after the October 17th meeting of the EEC ministers and who in turn will have agreed an extension to enable this to happen, and in which instances the opposition parties (with the exception of the DUP) will campaign for any agreement, revocation, new agreement, and possibly no deal to be put to the people in a second referendum.


It is evident that all the Party leaders (and this may include the D.U.P) together with an increasing number of Conservatives in addition to the those effectively expelled, have concluded, or reinforced their view, that Mr Johnson is unfit to be Prime Minister and have agreed to do what is required to be rid of him. Part of the agreed plan is to also expose the role and behaviour of Dominic Cummings who has now been named by the opposition and several lading conservatives as the agent of Johnson’s plan.


This was brought out clearly with media interviews and speeches made in the Commons by the majority of those expelled with a number of powerful and emotional contributions by those have decided not to stand in the general election and those who will stand as independent conservatives, independents or for other parties. 


Last night Ken Clark in the General Election debate called Boris dishonest, saying one thing and doing another and all the other leaders said he was untrustworthy. The Speaker allowed one backbencher to remind the House that Johnson had been twice shown to be a liar and Jeremy Corbyn said in effect he was two faced, unscrupulous and lacking integrity. Jeremy has not once attacked back during he years of verbal assaults on his record and intentions, I thought something had fundamentally changed when Tony Blair advised Corbyn and the other Opposition parties not to agree the General Election and opened the door to campaigning for Labour in the General Election



 The Speaker told him Johnson abruptly and then politely to sit down, and also to use acceptable Parliamentary language and behaviour, and when Ken Clark drew attention that the Chancellor of the Exchequer was out of order when commencing his Party political election spending statement, the Speaker said he had accepted  the statement would take longer (45 mins) but told the Chancellor twice to stick to the terms of reference of the statement.

Secondly, the Opposition Parties and leading Tories not in the Government, understand that if Johnson is not stopped now, this will only be the start of his approach to stay in power insisting on complete obedience of all the members of his government, backbenchers and advisers and like Trump getting rid of anyone who opposes or appears disloyal.


Thirdly, he is already turning the Tory Party, not just into the Brexit Party to defeat Farage, but an ideological free market, low tax, and low welfare party despite the appearance of ending austerity in order to win his first General Election. It appears, unconfirmed, that the Chancellor’s proposed speech was rejected and one re written for him hence the marching out of No 10 but an armed policer man of one of the Chancellor’s official advisers.


All the Opposition political Parties with the exception of the DUP although there may informal communication between anti Boris Tories and individual member of the D.U.P have agreed that the only way to politically get rid of Boris is to defeat him a general election once the No deal legislation becomes law with the Royal assent. They have agreed that the general election should not take place until after the October 17th Meeting of E.E.C leaders who they are confident will agree to extend article 50 to avoid a no deal Brexit. They accept this will involve the government seeking legislation to set aside the Fixed Term Parliament Act, but in a way which will be amendable so that the date can be determined by the House of Commons following agreement between all the Party Leaders. They appear confident the EEC will agree to the extension and which may be extended further to cover for the proposed second referendum.

I am confident that all the Opposition parties have agreed that they will campaign in the general election to hold a second referendum with a commitment to implement whatever is decided and this includes the Tory “rebels”. 


The next bit is speculation on my part but there may even be agreement between the Parties for election pacts because of the likely Remain vote split between the Lib Dems and Labour. It has been agreed that if the Labour Party is the biggest party in a situation where they do not have an overall majority (possible even if they do have a majority, they will accept a request to hold a second Scottish Referendum although the Party will campaign for the Union.

It was also evident that Jo Swinson has been on a Leader’s training course and was impressive at PMQ’s and the General Election debate.


Several of the Tory rebels made it clear they oppose and want to stop a Jeremy Corbyn and  McDonnell government, but the SNP and Lib Dems had stopped attacking Jeremy Corbyn, and Jo Swinson has clarified than in saying Ken Clark and Harriet Harman should lead an interim government this was said on the basis the Jeremy would not as things stood be able to form a minority government but this many have changed after Tony Blair endorsed the changed position and all the Labour rebels except John Mann and Kate Hoey voted for the stop no deal Bill.      




Thursday, 29 August 2019

Avoid a state of emergency reaction to suspension of Parlianment over No Deal Brexit




On Tuesday August 29th, 2019 Jeremy Corbyn leader of the Opposition in the House of Commons and of the Labour Party, together with the Opposition Leader in the House of Commons, Valery Vaz, Labour negotiators on Brexit John McDonnell and Sir Keir Starmer met with the leaders of  the Scottish National Party, the Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru, the Greens and the Independent Group for change, having previously consulted Conservative Parliamentarians and by the end of the two hour meeting agreed a two stage approach to prevent a no deal Brexit on October 30th


The first agreed approach to prevent exiting the EEC without a deal is through  the second use of Standing Order 24 on Tuesday September 3rd about 4pm after the scheduled Foreign and Commonwealth Office Questions, the introduction of a ten minute rule Bill and a plethora of Points of Order questions by backbenchers sympathetic to the government to introduced a Bill to force the Prime Minister to formally ask for another extension to Article 50 if No deal is the only other option. 


The Bill similar in wording to that previously presented by Yvette Cooper and Oliver Letwin and is expected to gain a greater margin of approval in the House of Commons because of the number of supporting members of the Tory Party. The potential obstacle is the House of Lords which previously prolonged consideration through filibustering and where the expectation is that the attempt will made to prevent the bill passing in both Houses as required before the planned three week break for the Liberal Democrat, Labour and Conservative Annual Party Conferences. There were reserve plans to continue the session through the Conference season or limit the conference absences to three or four days each week


The planned response of the Government yesterday is designed to make this difficult and create longer term and a potential election winning advantage. This led to immediate opposition on the streets, with more promised, cries of foul and two legal challenges.


The tactic is to reduce the time for the Parliamentary time for the legislation but not prorogue Parliament until Nov 1st which would have forced ministerial resignations and made no deal definite. 


The Government plan is to thwart any attempt to take No deal off the negotiating table and force the ECC to compromise with a deal which pass Parliament on the basis that there are only 100 Tories who want no deal even if the back stop is removed and 100 hard core labour who want revocation and will not accept a comprise. There is therefore a majority likely to be in favour of a compromise, possibly Mrs May’s deal if the alternative is no deal, End the means that if necessary Mrs May’s deal can be reconsidered and also paves the way for electing a new Speaker or threatening to do so before a General Election.


The other problem is Mrs May agreed to act on the new law, Boris may find a legal way not to.  The ECC will also have to agree an extension which Macron in particular said he would not support. The EEC is only likely to agree a limited extension to get the implementation legislation through Parliament which may require losing/ replacing about 100 of the existing members of the Commons.



A general election was on the cards if there is no deal or a deal, given the latest Polls. The Brexit party has offered the Tory Party a deal not to stand against them in agreed seat if they deselect about 40 to 50 exist anti Brexit MP’s presumably given them the seats and a confidence and supply agreement if necessary.


The Opposition approach has been to put off the no confidence vote because Tory members won’t bring down the government unless it is the only last resort, and other opposition parties and many Labour back benchers know that Corbyn would gain election advantage if he becomes temporary Prime Minister and stops No Deal. He has not ruled out the idea of an all Party temporary coalition led by Clark and Harriet Harman in their capacities of the recognised Father and Mother of the House of Commons, who have both held Ministerial offices and command respect in respective Parties.


Boris knows that he could win a General Election based on a Government on behalf of the people versus the Commons. Corbyn’s team know they have to also deselect at least 50 existing members if they are to command loyalty when in Government.


Boris also knows that serious disorder on the streets will be sufficient to declare a state of emergency and this may already have been agreed with the Head of State.  Trump may have offered to use US resources including off the books resources to monitor ant Brexit Parliamentarians and others individuals of influence. Any state of emergency will enable the government to control the media, including social media.

Friday, 5 July 2019

Deputy Leader of Labour Party seeks MI5 help to expel hard left members of the PLP from the Party

The Deputy Leader was Gordon Brown  who supported the  decision of Party Leader and Leader of the Official Opposition  Hugh Gaitskell in 1961. At their instigation Patrick Walker provided MI5 with a handwritten list of 16 names on House of Commons notepaper.


I was reminded of their action when writing about the reasons why special branch and MI5 kept not only me but those who visited my home in Wallington 1959 and 1962 in the context of writing about the significance of the Challenor Police Scandal, the Portland, Vassal and Profumo spy scandals in relation to the unsolved murder of my friend Ann Haldane in 1963 who had worked at the Admiralty for five years since leaving the Hackbridge Secondary Modern School aged sixteen years. The unsolved murder should be regarded as one of the worst failures to arrest and  successful prosecute a killer in British policing history. Twenty people were close by, when the killer struck,  providing detailed descriptions and some seventy people were estimated to be surrounding her body when two street patrolling constables arrived at the murder scene minutes later. 

Possible reason why the murder has remained unsolved forms the first four sections of Coincidence, Connections and Contradictions.

One of those who visited the home of the three aunties with whom I lived at Maldon Court in Bute Road was the daughter of the Member of Parliament for Morpeth, 1954-1970,  Will Owen who was acquitted of selling low level information to a Soviet State. Christopher Andrew in the authorised history of MI5 discloses the information on page 413 of the 1000 page history. Her states "Though Owen was acquitted, he was almost certainly, guilty as charged."  Andrew explains that it was not until Josef Frolik was questioned by the United States intelligence service in 1969 during the Wilson Government, that information was provided that John Stonehouse and Will Owen had both been recruited by Czech  intelligence Pages 541-543.

Will stayed on at his London home in 1970 and became  leader of the Labour members on the London Borough of Sutton  when as Vice President of the Association of Child Care Officers, I had chaired a committee which recommended the blacklisting of the Borough because it had amalgamated its Children Department services under the control of the Health Committee and Medical Officers Health in an attempt to stop the removal of local democratic control of health services, something which I shared,  but not at the expense of diminishing the professional social work standards being reached in the provision of statutory Child Care.

Future Prime Minister, Jim Callaghan and a future leader of the Social Democrats Roy Jenkins had advised  of the need to take action if the  Wilson government was to be able to get through Parliament Social Services Legislation as had already happened in Scotland with the Social Work Scotland act. I had been introduced to the two Labour Home Secretaries when arranging a drinks party at Parliament to celebrate the passage of 1969 Children's and Young Persons Act  when it was evident they had been briefed about my  background working for the Direct Action Committee Against Nuclear War, helping to organise the  Whitsun 1961 civil disobedience demonstrations at Holy Loch, and a member of the Committee 100. It is not known if they were aware of my meeting at Scotland Yard with George Clark before the Aldermaston march where we were introduced to representatives from the Home Office and Admiralty, but not others who I assumed at the time were from the US Embassy/CIA.   In accordance with the principles of Satyagraha I had been open about our plans and intentions as I was subsequently with senior polices and local authority officials on both sides of the Clyde, agreeing to making a formal statement which merit a letter of warning from the Commander of the Flagship, Scotland. The response of the authorities was remarkably varied. Those at Dumbarton on the North bank refused to talk. The Police at Clydebank  asked how many officers we wanted to assist in our march and also said  the traffic would be stopped when I said we would follow the usual rule  keep to one side of the roadway and allowing for breaks in the march to allow traffic to cross  route roads. The politicians at Greenock and Gourock arranged for the Clerk, Treasurer and chief Education officer to meet and offer what help was needed in terms of overnight accommodation, food and safe passage.

I was  subsequently invited to a meeting of the Labour Party group of Sutton Council to talk about social services after I had been appointed Director of Social Services at South Tyneside. Sadly the Party only came close to power and with the rise of the Liberal Democrats there have been no Labour Councillors since 2006.

A coincidence is that in 1969, the Attorney General,. Sir Elwyn Jones, a future Lord Chancellor, authorised a  search warrant and  police interrogation of Will Owen who admitted receiving untaxed money but not to disclosing classified information. I had met  his daughter twice during the communist led youth Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament marches  between Liverpool and Hull Christmas to New Year 1959 1960 and I960 1961. We met again on a hillside  overlooking Holy Loch  on Whit Monday when I was checking to see  that those who remained  camping out overnight were able to return to their homes. I invited her attend a meeting of the Wallington Youth CND which she  did.

There would also have been interest when the group accepted the invitation of two of the sons of  Ritchie Calder, Angus wrote the People's War, to meet at their home in Cheam. Ritchie Calder was President of the National Peace Council and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.  Ian Dixon, a member of the Director  Action Committee and of the Committee 100, a former  journalist for Peace News, also came to speak at a meeting.